Good Night, and Good Luck—And He
Meant It
by The Blonde and The Maven Film
Columnists
George Clooney, the son of an anchorman himself,
has brought to the screen a fascinating, narrow but
focused look into a period of history that helped shape
American television, journalism and its relationship to
politics. Writing with Grant Heslov (who plays reporter
Don Hewitt), Clooney shows us how difficult it is to do
the right thing.
The key players in this drama
are Edward R. Murrow, a reporter who came to popularity
during WW2 with his front line reporting. David
Strathairn (L.A. Confidential and Dolores Claiborne)
gives a riveting performance as the taciturn,
chain-smoking, dedicated news reporter whose conflict
with the methods of the senator from Wisconsin, Joseph
McCarthy, is the main focus of this film. George Clooney
(Ocean’s Eleven and Twelve AND VERY HANDSOME) plays Fred
Friendly (real name) who is Ed’s producer on the show
“See It Now,” based on news items of the day. Friendly
remains Ed’s producer for the duration of “See It Now”
(1951-1958) and went on to become the president of the
CBS news division in 1954. He resigned two years later
when the network decided to run an “I Love Lucy” re-run
rather than show live coverage of the Senate hearings on
Vietnam. William Paley, played by Frank Langella
(Dracula and Dave), ran CBS radio and television
networks for more then fifty years and served as
president of the network until 1946 when he became
chairman of the CBS board. He retained the chairmanship
until his death in 1990. Sig Mickelson, portrayed by
Jeff Daniels (Terms of Endearment and The Hours), was
head of CBS Network, News and Public Affairs division.
He was instrumental in building an in-house department
of camera crews to document footage which had previously
relied on newsreel companies. Joe Wershba, played by
Robert Downey, Jr. (Wonderboys and Gothika) was an
associate producer on “See It Now” and later went on to
become one of the original producers of “60 Minutes.” Ed
and Fred defy corporate and sponsorship pressures with
their desire to report the facts and enlighten the
public as to the lies and scaremongering tactics
perpetrated by McCarthy during his communist “witch
hunts.” When a story about U.S. Air Force Lieutenant
Milo Radulovitch comes to their attention, Murrow makes
the decision to go with the story on air. This reservist
was kicked out of the U.S.A.F. for being a security
risk. He was declared guilty with no trial. Murrow
suspected that McCarthy may have had something to do
with Radulovitch’s dismissal and worries that the closed
hearings and the theatrical hostility of accusations
hide the fact that the senator has no proof. Murrow
believes the atmosphere of the hearings is eroding the
people’s civil liberties. When Sig tries to warn them
off the story, Ed and Fred wave his misgivings away and
offer to pay for the lost revenue from the show’s
sponsors that week. Sure enough, McCarthy sees the
broadcast and responds with accusations that Murrow is a
communist. Now, Murrow feels he has to expose McCarthy
for his false statements. Everyone in the newsroom will
now come under the Committees microscope. All feel the
pressure, but are committed to supporting Murrow. The
subsequent broadcast does not attack Senator McCarthy
directly. Footage of his questioning at the hearings is
shown as are newsreel footage of his statements against
people. When McCarthy responds to the broadcast, he
cannot attack it directly. They are, after all, his
words. He can only attack Murrow. Thus begins McCarthy’s
very public downfall. Edward R. Murrow pointed out to
the public where McCarthy failed to draw the line
between “investigation and persecution”; that “dissent
is not disloyalty”; and that “accusation is not
proof.”
This masterpiece of filmmaking is shown
off with Robert Elswit’s lustrous black and white
lensing, which mixed well with the vintage 16mm and
kinescope material in which McCarthy is seen. Clooney’s
target is never in doubt. The film’s focus is on the
newsroom as it chronicles the angst, drive and fear that
drove these reporters to take on a Senator and his
unjust ethics.
The
Blonde: MMMMMMMM! This poignant film was like All the
Presidents Men meets Network meets Watergate meets Quiz
Show who all meet Dan Rather. Talk about the story of a
man way ahead of his time. Murrow’s courage, morals,
ethics and daring perspective to challenge what he felt
was wrong, single handedly changed the way reporters
look at reporting. Talk about guts, in an era when no
one dared to challenge the heads of the media or any
body else, Murrow didn’t care! Or maybe he cared that
much! He paved the way for future journalists who dared
to travel into the face of controversial issues. Very
serious man, he probably was absolutely NO FUN at a
party!
The
Maven: I can’t say it enough, this movie is a must see!
The civics lesson alone is worth it! For those who were
around at this time, you see what it took to stand up
for something you believed in. All those men were loyal
Americans who were disgusted by the behavior of a lone
senator misusing his office to label dissenters as
traitors. For those (like me) who came after, it’s a
good glimpse into the workings of network news in the
1950s and the courage of a man to stand up for his civil
rights. They were not trying to win higher ratings; they
were fighting for integrity. If you think this lesson is
old news, take a look around! McCarthyism is alive and
flourishing in today’s politics. If you don’t support
Bush’s decision to go and subsequently stay in Iraq,
then you are labeled, Disloyal to the President and
“Un-American”! How many constitutional rights are
being threatened in the name of the Patriot Act? Where
is the Edward R. Murrow of today? And when…
The
Blonde: Hey, hey, let me get in here for a second! So
political for our little Maven! I would have to respond
to your dissertation by saying that this was a sad time
in our society where, if you challenged anyone in our
government, you were accused of being a communist. Now
you would just be a comedian! I think the Murrows of
today are John Stewart, Bill Mahr and Jay Leno. Moving
right along, the black and white style in which they
shot this film was most effective. It really brought you
back to the day. Woody Allen would have loved this
style. The cigarette and pipe smoke that filled the
rooms also brought you back to this time and culture. No
wonder Rob Petrie, Darren Stevens, and Ricky Ricardo
smoked! It was THE thing to do!
The
Maven: More like the only thing to do, as married
couples on television slept in two separate twin
beds!
The
Blonde: Then how were Ritchie, Tabatha and little Rickey
born? Unfortunately, I did feel this movie was, at
times, a bit dry and slow. It also never seemed to move
me to the point of anger or being really upset. I think
the whole purpose of telling this tale was to do just
that, and it missed the mark! I would have liked to see
more of the story about McCarthy and how he black-listed
Hollywood stars. I wanted more information on Murrow’s
personal life and what drove him! I was never REALLY
moved and I wanted to be!
The
Maven: George Clooney sticks close to the details here.
There are no side plots in this film. Clooney’s focus
was on the television event, not the characters’
personal lives. It was exhilarating watching the
atmosphere in the newsroom, sometimes brave, other times
cautious, yet always with a sense of justice pursued
with love for the job at hand. I found myself wanting to
be there working (only with better hair).
The
Blonde: I agree with your hair comment. Mav, did you
notice the way the secretaries looked back then? There
were big women with their hair slicked back into a bun,
black clunky nurse’s shoes and glasses. Boy, have times
changed. Women then didn’t have to worry too much about
their husbands having an affair with their secretaries,
at least! By the way, I thought the casting was right on
here, except for Joe’s wife (Downey’s character)
Shirley, played by Patricia Clarkson. She looked more
like his mother than his wife. It was wrong to the point
of distraction. David, who portrays Murrow, was scary
dead on from his voice to his looks and mannerisms!
The
Maven: I remember seeing clips of Murrow from his
person-to-person interview show, and David Strathairn
did an amazing job. His look was perfect and, more than
that, his expressions and inflections in speech were
spooky! I read that in the initial script reading, Milo
Radulovitch, Fred Friendly’s two sons and Joe and
Shirley Wershba were present. How intimidating must that
have been?
The
Blonde: Are you asking me or telling me? Ahhhhhhh…
very?!?! One thing I do know is this was the first
time EVER that I wasn’t drooling staring at George the
entire movie! I don’t know, Mav, I think you liked this
film much more than I did. Maybe I was distracted by the
people sitting in front of me who were talking non-stop
or the guy to my left on his cell phone talking the
whole time or the lady to my right crinkling her fruit
candy. In addition, my popcorn was stale and you know
how upset THAT makes me!
The
Maven: I disagree, it could have been much worse. I had
to see this movie with My MOTHER!
The
Blonde: OK, YOU WIN! NEVER MIND!
The
Maven: I thought you would see it my way!
The
Blonde: By the way, Mav, Martha Stewart must be so proud
of her son, comedian John Stewart!
The
Maven: He is not her son!!! Ignore her, readers, she
can’t help herself! This film was intelligent,
insightful, and compelling. I felt 90 minutes was too
short. I wanted so much more, but I understand Clooney’s
need to only focus on the television event. I loved
everything about this film. I rate it an A for
astounding depth and amazing atmosphere as well as my
unadulterated infatuation with Clooney as a filmmaker at
the chance he took to make this movie the way he
did. The Blonde: I couldn’t disagree more
this time with the Mav. I wanted so much more as well
and that is why I felt that this film left me hanging.
Because of that I rate it a B—! For your movie snacks go
with some Sno-Caps candy as this film is BLACK AND
WHITE! For that matter, bring along a black and white
cookie! Now, go watch some John Stewart!
All content
property of Entertainment News & Views © 2003.
Nothing that appears on this site may be reproduced,
either wholly or in part, without the written permission
of the publishers and solely at their discretion.
|